FREE Download of sermon I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist!: 👉📱https://cutt.ly/cInI1eo
@raywingfield Says:
We don't know?
@robertdoell4321 Says:
BIG BANG = Everything from Nothing Evolution = Life from Nothing
GOD proved HIMself through Thousands of Proven fulfilled Prophecies
Birth, Life of Miracles, crucifixion, resurrection under Roman Guard, visiting for 40 days witnessed by over 500 witnesses, JESUS ascension to Heaven. JESUS Prophesied Israel reborn and that would be the last generation when all will be fulfilled. No Other Culture has been vanquished and Spread over the World and regathered again to be a country in 2000 years Only Israel with their language and religion intact.
@SpotterVideo Says:
God is a weaver, and the first thing He made was the thread. He used the 4 spatial dimensions in Ephesians 3:18.
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957–8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.---
@ganymedkallisto5561 Says:
„Any material entity is going to involve change on the molecular and atomic levels“. There were no atoms and therefore no molecules at the big bang. It took 380,000 years for electrons to be trapped in orbits around nuclei, forming the first atoms. These were mainly helium and hydrogen, which are still by far the most abundant elements in the universe.
@jimjuri6490 Says:
God never created everything out of nothing. Einstein's relativity formula E = mc^2 helps understand what God used. His boundless and awesome energy at his disposal.
Isaiah 40:26 “Lift up your eyes to heaven and see. Who has created these things?
It is the One who brings out their army by number; He calls them all by name.
Because of HIS VAST DYNAMIC ENERGY AND HIS AWE-INSPIRING POWER, Not one of them is missing.
@JamesRichardWiley Says:
The word "no thing" is meaningless. The space that surrounds you and flows through you is an invisible energy field that produces the electricity that powers your home. It's not nothing.
@lawrencehalpin6611 Says:
What I can't believe is Christians (well educated) don't believe the Bible. You need to do more investigation into creation. kind regards
@markfullbrighton5070 Says:
No disrespect, but I can't take William Lane Craig seriously until he comes out from hiding under his "Talbot desk" and decides to debate Jeffery Jay Lowder. Jeffery Jay Lowder is the best atheist debater there is. Check out his debates with Phil Fernandes and Frank Turek where he absolutely destroys both of them. Given how good of a debater Lowder is, I can see why William Lane Craig has been ducking a debate with him since the late 1990s.
@midlander4 Says:
Turdrek and Low Bar Bill. A match made in hell.
@midlander4 Says:
William Liar Craig. One joke interviewed by another joke
@guidos.6043 Says:
The “billions of years” argument rages against Scripture. The Bible is either true or it is not.
Whoever claims that evolution is scientific, hasn’t actually studied its tenets in detail. All that is needed is to just look beneath the surface. If they had, they would know that for something to be scientific, it would have to obey known physical laws, which evolution does not. Therefore, evolution is pseudoscience. To try to inject scientific concepts after the fact is absurd, and a violation of the Scientific Method.
If the “Big Bang” happened, it betrayed the First Law of Thermodynamics, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Boyle’s Law, etc.
Fairy tales have no place in the Church.
Remember… it is scientifically impossible for something to come from nothing.
@joshbeard9809 Says:
Bill Craig is not a man to be trusted on creation. He bows or appeals to "science" and puts his philosophy before his Christianity. Go to people like Ken Ham and others who do real science and aren't fooled by man's religion or politics masquerading as science.
@mattslater2603 Says:
So it is theists that believe that something came from nothing.
Funny how many lying Christians tries to hang that on atheists... when its THEIR belief.
@kinggenius930 Says:
Sorry Frank, I don't have enough evidence to be a Christian
@samnewton3358 Says:
God is all-powerful so creating everything from nothing was no problem for him.
@JamesRichardWiley Says:
Bill explains how he decides the Cosmos cannot be eternal but an imaginary Hebrew god can.
I guess Bill just makes up stuff that makes him feel safe.
@logicalatheist1065 Says:
There no reason to believe any god exists
@rf7477 Says:
Long ago a caveman saw a flash of lightning and then heard a clap of thunder. "What was that!" he cries in alarm. If he asks that question often enough, an answer will soon come. "god didit" says the witchdoctor. Here we are in the 21st century and the modern day frauds and shamans are still saying it, "god didit". This is an endless tautology. "why did god do it?" "because he is infinitely wise". "how did he get infinitely wise?" "because he was already infinitely wise to start with"...ad nauseam.
@Servant44 Says:
🙏
We must go and preach [repentance] And [remission of sins] Among All nations
and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Luke 24:47 KJV
- Believe [for your faith will save you]
I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for [if ye believe not] that I am he, ye shall [die in your sins.]
John 8:24 KJV
- To give knowledge of salvation [by the remission of "our" sins]
To give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the [remission of their sins,]
Luke 1:77 KJV
- Receive [remission of sins] when initially believing
To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name [whosoever believeth] [in him] shall [receive] [remission of sins.]
Acts 10:43 KJV
- Convert sinner from his error of sin [convince someone of their error, like we were convinced]
Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall [hide a multitude of sins.]
James 5:20 KJV
- Confession of sin [confess your sins, everyday]
If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to [forgive us our sins,] and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1 John 1:9 KJV
- [Remission of sins] from water baptism
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be [baptized] every one of you in the [name of Jesus Christ] for the [remission of sins,] and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts 2:38 KJV
- Have charity [to have compassion]
And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall [cover the multitude of sins.]
1 Peter 4:8 KJV
- Love [to love thy neighbor as thyself]
Hatred stirreth up strifes: but [love covereth all sins.]
Proverbs 10:12 KJV
- Endure [predestined are those that endure until the end and do not die in sin]
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that shall [endure unto the end,] the same [shall be saved.]
Mark 13:13 KJV
- Repent from sin [or All will likewise perish]
I tell you, Nay: but, [except ye repent,] ye shall [all likewise perish.]
Luke 13:3 KJV
@hansdemos6510 Says:
At 1:06 into the video, Dr. Bill "Low Bar" Craig says: _"Now scientifically, the origin of the universe in the big bang model is not just the origin of our universe, rather it is the origin of all the matter and energy and even of physical space and time themselves."_
This is incorrect. The big bang model concerns the expansion of something that was already there, and humanity has not yet been able to figure out what that "something" was. Both Dr. Craig and Dr. Turek have been corrected on this numerous times. They are willfully spreading misinformation. Please go and check out what real scientists have to say about this.
@realitywins6457 Says:
If God is without beginning or end, then there can never be absolutely nothing. There would always be at least him. What there can be, however, is a reduction of available properties isolated within a subset of reality. He could make this subset and define properties such as time/space/mathematics/physics, then speak into them. A beginning suddenly has meaning. And what we call natural is really a subset of the greater reality from which we came.
@phoenixanimations5233 Says:
And all that Universe was created for one purpose: to put some naked talking apes to hell.
@jamesw4250 Says:
No one except the religious claim everything came from nothing. Scientists font make that claim. There are mutiple differing origins for our current space time. One is a repeating collapse and then expansion of the universe. Another ideas is a simple phase trasition from one state of the universe to another. A singularity is not nothing. And no one should listen to either William lame Craig or franky boy.
@maxhagenauer24 Says:
Everything either came from nothing for no reason at all or everything has always existed for no reason at all, both of which are absurd. Saying it was an eternal god is one of those. Even if god exists, his existence doesn’t even explain why anything exusts because he himself needs a reason to exist even if he is eternal and uncaused.
@RangerRyke Says:
Speculating on the nature of reality before the Big Bang is just pulling stuff out the a** to be frank. No one knows anything about it except that something out of nothing doesn’t make sense.
@ancientfiction5244 Says:
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.***
*Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.***
***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service.
*"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"*
*"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"*
*"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"*
*"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"*
Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:45 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes.
From a Biblical scholar:
"Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."*
*"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"*
------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, look up the below articles.
*"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! – Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"*
*"Debunking the Devil – Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"*
*"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"*
*"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"*
(Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief)
*"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"*
*"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From?
*"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"*
Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica
(Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years)
*"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology – The Sensuous Curmudgeon"*
*"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"*
*"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"*
*"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"*
Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"*
(8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science)
*"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"*
*"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"*
*"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"*
*"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"*
*"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures – Griffin"*
*"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei
(This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies)
*"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei
*"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@baconboyxy Says:
The pellet you refer to is often called the singularity and how you have unilaterally managed to determine that the laws of physics for our universe affect this singularity and predate our universe amazes me (that is to say, how can you use laws of the universe to describe the universe’s precursor).
@jackprescott9652 Says:
Inside what is this Universe expanding?
@mr_fusion85 Says:
I thought that was David Lee Roth for a second.
@tevesrevolution9330 Says:
GUYS!!! REPENT AND TURN TO JESUS CHRIST HE'S COMING SOON !! THAT'S NOT ABOUT BELIEF THAT'S THE TRUTH!!
HELL IS REAL AND Y'ALL DON'T WANT TO GO THERE!!
RUN FROM THE THINGS OF THIS WORLD AND FOCUS ON JESUS!!!!!!!!
@tTtt-ho3tq Says:
Singularity. The BB from the songularity. Molecular, atomic ... it was before molecules, before atoms, before sub-atomic particles. It's not nothing. If nothing it'd violate the laws of thermodynamics. So what was the singularity? We don't know because the current science breaks down at that time. That's why called Singularity because we don't yet know what it was, but whatever it was it was probably in quantum state and equvalent in energy to the whole universe. I may be wrong but something like that.
@Eye_Witness Says:
I can imagine that when God spoke everything into existence by His word (Jesus/Yeshua) there was a big bang just from the sound of His voice. That word is still vibrating and everything is being held together by the word (Jesus/Yeshua) just as the Bible says.
@katamas832 Says:
False: The Big Bang states what was going on during and throughout the expansion. It doesn't say it's where energy came into being. Physical space also should've existed. It is an EXPANSION of space.
I love how they never bring a cosmologist to any of these discussions 😂😂 They'd get their congregation's entire view of the Big Bang shattered.
@larzman651 Says:
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the LORD JESUS and shalt believe in thy heart that GOD raised him from the dead thou shalt be Saved 🙌 for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation
@william3347 Says:
Apparently energy or light can be converted into matter according to recent discoveries. Which sounds like something made from nothing according to our current limited knowledge. That being the case the Bible's suggestion that God created everything that exists seems even more plausible.
@macmac1022 Says:
But if the energy that the matter came from was already there then this argument is wrong.
@thierry860 Says:
You know the all "something from nothing" is a religious belief. No scientist think that.
@cnault3244 Says:
"William Lane Craig Explains How Everything Came From Nothing"
Really? If that is true, and god exists, god is a thing which would mean that god came from nothing.
@mikejurney9102 Says:
I disagree. At scales smaller than the Plank scale, there are no atoms, or even subatomic particles yet. There is not enough space for things to move around in. So there is no detectable change of things with which to observe the passage of time. So we aren't capable of saying how long this motionless state of affairs could continue. It may have been like this for just an instant, or there may have been an infinite amount of time that it was like this. In other words, the laws of physics at this stage would have been time invariant.
@cnault3244 Says:
WLC's argument works just as well for an explanation of how Ptah or Brahma or Odin or Zeus or any other creator deity people have believed in created the universe.
@cnault3244 Says:
"How do we know it was creation out of nothing?" ???? You have skipped a step there. You have to prove it was created ( creation requires some sort of sentience behind it) before you ask if it was created out of nothing.
@nikokapanen82 Says:
Not out of nothing, but rather out of God. Out of nothing, nothing comes.
@joestfrancois Says:
The "Big Bang" is not a beginning, it is only as far back as humans can observe. Educate yourselves people, so you don't sound like idiots!
@gi169 Says:
Thank you CE.
@MapleBar777 Says:
Gen 1:5
No need to make an omnipotent God's work fit into a secular worldview.
@xTheUnknownTruthx Says:
When he says something came from nothing, this makes no sense as a Word is something that has substance. Just like the words or very bits of this video passing through a medium. It is a flawed basis honestly and is not really based in scripture, but philosophy it seems that is all William has is morals and dogma....Will continue to pray for his repentance.
@jonyivre4541 Says:
Heaven existed
@gordo191 Says:
If the earth was created by a big bang what created the moon and sun mmmm three coincidences at the same time , what's the chances of that ???
@migueltorres2198 Says:
The science of the atheist isn't the Science of God.
LATEST COMMENTS