<<@CrossExamined says : Subscribe to our channel here ➑️ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCedYGs_lqq1uNet0u7qlSyQ?sub_confirmation=1>> <<@olivieryeung398 says : always amazing to watch Dr Tukek's videos and especially the Q&A sections>> <<@mikes7423 says : 2:08:42 @crossexamined. Dr. Turek, you speak from an old-earth viewpoint. Do you make a distinction between old-earth (non-life) and evolution; that is old-life through evolution vs a young-life through 6-day creation? Or is your view linked; that if the earth is old, than life is old as well and if the earth is new than life must be young as well? Thank you.>> <<@Marstang22 says : The NT cites the "apocrypha" constantly lol>> <<@moose9906 says : Once saved always saved is wrong because, as Frank says "God in not going to force you into heaven against your will". Not Before you accept Christ and not IF you change your mind and reject Him. Frank's argument that you receive eternal life when you accept Christ is correct but it is conditional. You must continue to accept Christ as your Lord and Savior. You still have free will after you make the choice for Christ and that means you can choose to reject Christ. Any argument to the contrary is logically incoherent if you accept the two principles Frank does accept. 1) That we have free will and that is remains at least as long as you a physically living and 2) That God will not force you into heaven against your will. Frank needs to think this one through and follow the logic where it leads. If premise 1 and 2 are true then you can lose your salvation. There is also theological evidence for this as the scripture speaks of blotting out names from the Book of Life. If once saved always saved was true, no name would ever be blotted out. Names would only be added as they accepted Christ. The counter argument that maybe they were never really saved doesn't work for the following reasons. First, for the individual in question, losing their salvation and never really being saved is indistinguishable and thus has to be treated the same. Second, it doesn't address the theological problem of why names are being blotted out of the Book of Life.>> <<@moose9906 says : Frank really didn't address why what happened in Job was allowed but spoke about satan and Jesus in the desert. The best explanation I have heard regarding Job, is that God allowed it to change Job's heart. Job had been righteous and obedient to God but it wasn't because he loved God but because he feared HIM and bowed to His power. At the end of Job, Job had learned to have a personal relationship with God based on Love and not only obedience to a master.>> <<@matthewturner1861 says : I didn't think they really existed, but that was the first time I ever saw a guy who believed in Sinless Perfection (prior to being with the Lord in Heaven). I love how calm and respectful Frank Turek was with that gentleman.>> <<@dperkins01 says : Tough questions sorry we got a long line, talk later.>> <<@RoyLogan-he2yr says : Can you explain why your religion sounds like a cult?>> <<@j.peaceo1031 says : Anyone who claims that man can no longer sin after accepting Christ unto salvation is dangerously mistaken. My goodness, this is the height of religious pride.>> <<@SoraJapan-w5o says : Wether we like it or not CHRIST JESUS is real imagine how Christmas is world wide and besides JESUS change me I'm from Philippines 😊>> <<@BrianBeam1611 says : Christianity DID start with a book, the Old Testament. All the apostles and NT ministers preached a book. They preached the scriptures.>> <<@justin10292000 says : Each and every person lives by faith, believing unprovable a priori basic beliefs and basing his or her worldview on unprovable presuppositions. The entire scientific enterprise itself is based on philosophical faith-based presuppositions! I don't have enough faith to be an atheist. At this point in my life, after the sum total of my life experiences, it would take me MUCH MORE faith to NOT believe than TO believe in Jesus Christ as the Way, the Truth and the Life. Everyday just adds to affirmations of His Truth. Once one's spiritual eyes and heart are TRULY opened to the Truth of Jesus Christ, there is no going back.>> <<@BrianBuitragoStudios says : Praise God. Adam is absolutely spot on. Nowhere in scripture does God call a saint a sinner.>> <<@randyschmidt19 says : Dude has no idea what faith is or has no idea what an atheist is>> <<@KRGruner says : LOL, the kind of nonsense that makes Sam Harris appear to be a genius. And I can't stand Sam Harris...>> <<@thehelpdesk4051 says : That was a tough crowd>> <<@black-cross says : 2:08:42 the universe is 6k years old. why would god wait 13.8billion years if the focus is on us? the universe may be expanding but that doesnt change its age. if im a 30 year old man made by god 30 seconds ago, me continuing ageing doesnt change that fact. and it does matter how old the earth is. is doubting god's power and his word. and if a young earth is a fallacy, then what else is? it might not change your salvation but it does change your interpretation, causing to teach and do the wrong things>> <<@NewCreationInChrist896 says : We all can sin even saints but saints don’t live in or for sin. Brother Adam reminds me of law advocate believers, when talking to them it’s in circles because they are prideful and have a spirit keeping them from understanding grace, like the Pharisees Titus 3:4-5. They ignore the scriptures about believers having imputed righteousness InChrist and nonbelievers have imputed sin InAdam Romans 4:8; 5:13-14. Both are spiritual states of the believer and the nonbeliever, righteousness is a permitted spiritual state because of the promise of God in John 3:3 and the true hope in the believer’s heart in Ephesians 1:13. The sinful state of the nonbeliever can be changed if they truly believe and receive the gift of faith 2 Timothy 2:25 Romans 3:27-28 KJV. Romans 8:2 KJV explains verse one, but law advocate-believers always stop at verses one in their pride. Romans 8:1-2 doesn’t contradict John 3:17-18 in there perspective context. Paul was baptized in Damascus before he wrote Romans before his missionary journey. In Acts 9 it states he was healed of his blindness and baptized by Ananias of Damascus.>> <<@littleshrederdude says : DANG wish I had known you were coming! Totally would’ve attended>> <<@e.clinton says : 2:32:50 πŸŽ―πŸ’― This brother was right 1/ Apostle John in 1 John 1 was adressing i.e exposing the the heresy of the gnostics on some verses. Gnostics belief is: π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘¦ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘¦ π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘¦π‘œπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘™π‘‘ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘£π‘’ π‘“π‘’π‘™π‘™π‘œπ‘€π‘ β„Žπ‘–π‘ π‘€π‘–π‘‘β„Ž πΊπ‘œπ‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 π‘–π‘šπ‘šπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘¦ π‘π‘’π‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘ π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘™π‘’π‘ β„Ž 𝑖𝑠 π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ π‘π‘–π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘, meaning: you can be perfect, without sin, just because your spirit is "good"... 🀨 2/ In Romans 7, Apostle Paul was drawing a parallel with his former life as a Pharisee, living under the law and not under the law of Christ, which is freedom from the bondage of sin and, not a fatality as Cross Examined says (because of a so-called sinful nature, as the modern Church tried to teach). To understand Romans 7, it is imperative to read Romans 6, Romans 7 and Romans 8 for a complete answer and to understand Paul's context, for although these letters are written in the present tense, they mention the past of a born-again, more precisely a Jew who knew the law. We "Gentiles", a fortiori, are strangers to what Paul is saying, when it comes to the law.>> <<@filmscorelife4225 says : Cannibalism was forbidden. Jesus is not going to speak to a literal eating of his flesh. The reason he lost so many followers is because they had a different idea of who the messiah would be and accomplish. They wanted a military messiah and Jesus to die didn't fit their paradigm.>> <<@CaptainFantastic222 says : If someone is so confident in their own beliefs they don’t have to misrepresent other peoples beliefs and positions. Of course Frank knows what atheism is but he continues to be purposefully dishonest>> <<@jthomas7904 says : Some of his points are nonsensical. 1) Does the Bible teach the sun rises and sets? Well yes!! If you are looking at it from the perspective of standing on earth. Does the Bible teach the earth doesn't rotate? Does the Bible teach the earth hangs on nothing? 2) How old was Adam when he was first created? Ah... yes one. How old did Adam appear to be? Same for all of creation.>> <<@kylej.reeves4268 says : Dr. Turek, I have great respect for you and the work you do. I’ve watched almost every debate in which you’ve participated, so many of your lectures for hours on end, and I am always impressed. But if you never heard the Gospel at Mass, I really question how that could possibly be so. The entirety of the Mass declares the Gospel, beginning to end. The Gloria, the Creed, the requests for mercy for our faults, our grievous faults, in both what we have done and what we have failed to do. The recognition of the need of Christ as our Savior permeates the celebration of the Mass. As a truck driver, I have attended Catholic Mass in countless churches across the nation, and I hear the Gospel proclaimed clearly in 99% of them. It breaks my heart that you attended a parish and a Catholic school that did not emphasize these truths. Those who were supposed to teach you, failed you indeed. I would love to see you have a conversation, dialogue, or even a respectful debate with one or more of the prominent contemporary Catholic apologists. Trent Horn, Jimmy Akin, Matt Fradd, Joe Heschmeyer, Tim Staples, Karlo Broussard, Steve Ray, and so many others. From what I know of them, one of them would happily have a respectful dialog with you. And I would be honored to be educated by, and open-minded to, such a dialogue.>> <<@inotterwords6115 says : "If time was eternal, then today would have never arrived." I don't think time is eternal, but I don't think this is a good argument. It's like saying "if there were an infinite number of negative integers, we would've never arrived at zero". 'Arrived' implies some kind of traversal, and it can both be true that an infinite traversal is impossible, but there's an infinite space to traverse over.>> <<@lawrenceeason8007 says : I don’t have enough evidence to be a Christian>> <<@littleredpony6868 says : Saying that you don’t have enough faith to be an atheist is like saying that you don’t have enough faith not believe that Santa is real>> <<@NewCreationInChrist896 says : Repent and flee from Catholicism and its false doctrine and idolatry. Non Christian believers think they go to heaven by being in a β€œgood person,” a half truth is a whole lie. Galatians 1:8 Exodus 20:4>> <<@freddurstedgebono6029 says : 2:35:15 I went to a church where they thought like this. It’s a dangerous view. These people are liars are simply hide their sin. Typically legalists too>> <<@gi169 says : IDHEFTBAA is such a wonderful presentation. Thank you CE.>> <<@blakerand6818 says : Some great questions here>> <<@charlesbadrock says : Frank cleaning up with the $$ all power to you Frank business is business again Frank Mythology is very powerful in the human psyche>> <<@Alex_Pinkney says : Jaden πŸ’ͺ🏽πŸ’ͺ🏽>>
VideoPro
>>